Work as a




︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎
Social Carbon

Social Carbon


Hudson Valley, Suburban, and the Green New Deal

Symbiosis Habitat


Re-Invent Process of Nature into Urban Environment
through a Zoo-Function Metabolism

Hub of Lives


A Re-Interpretation of Group-Linking Compound and Tainan's Locality


Generative Design


Optimize Tomihiro Museum, A Circle Packing Layout Issue





Framework


Balancing Growth and Opportunity in Sunset Park




Re-Weaving Urban Activities
from the Perspective of Urban Water Cycle


Brooklyn Army Terminal 


Disconnect between intentions and reality

Seeding the Machamba



Beira, Mozambique
Reconnect social capital and build up resilience environment from the traditional inbetween spaces.


Build A Tree House!


Design-Build, Participatory Design, and Community Development
Build an "eco-classroom" with residents!

Other Works






Mark





Works

to practice medium out

︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎

Ban Xue Gang
Concert Hall

AI Valley


Climate Responsive Curtain wall development

Aqua Ring


Symbiosis of Water and Urbanism

Taoyuan Museum of Art


Space Connection and Multi-Culture Dialogue
through Fluidity of Freeform Architecture

Well Office

Building Performance Analysis






Mark





Research

to understand the world differently

︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎

World Mega-Events as An Urban Planning Strategy


How cities utilize global attention?
The Universiade as Casestudy

Bird Collition in
Urban Area


Who is a bird killer?




Mark



Symbiosis Habitat


Re-Invent Process of Nature into Urban Environment
through a Zoo-Function Metabolism

    
 



AWRADS
2018 Archiprix –the best thesis design / nominated
2017 The National Golden Award for Architecture / the Best Newcomer Architect
2017 TEAM20-Architecture and urban planning competition / Sustainable Environment Special Award
2017 TEAM20-Architecture and urban planning competition / 1st place
2017 IEAGD-Taiwan 20 (6x2) / Top 20 Finalist
2017 Thesis Design Award / 1st place


Date | 2017.02 - 2017.05
Instructor | Yu-Lin Chen
Site | Hsinchu city, Taiwan
#Individual Project
#Symbiosis #Urban Habitat #Zoological #Landscape #Animal Human #Ruinize



A zoo is not a window through which nature reveals its entirety, but a prism which refracts whatever culture we project. But this land should exuberate its indignant sense of being. People possess and then are possessed by nature—from constructing a caging powerhouse to seeking a co-existing family. Manmade structures wear and tear into wilderness and into ruins, allowing more lives to be sheltered.



In the 18th century, a zoo was a creation of Empi r icism, w hich encouraged domestication and control over nature. In the 21st century, Empiricism abdicates and people view a zoo as a window to see nature. Still, a zoo is yet another un-natural existence.

How do we withdraw this out-of-date/place existence and resume a space for lives that came before human invasion to return, to multiply into a blooming symbiotic environment?





Hills and low mountain belts protect the original species that disappeared from the plain after this habitat was developed. Because of the landscape in Hsinchu and Miaoli, urban activities and protected wild animals have more interactions.

I started to study possible habitats in Hsinchu and Miaoli regions.

According to theories about habitats, cities have certain green spaces or potential “Patches” which are suitable habitats for wildlife. Should these spaces have passage ways for animals to move around, cities could create biological networks, which intertwine and overlap with the cities’ traffic networks. I have identified some potential patches in Hsinchu City, including parks, schools, open areas, rivers and water ways, which can form a network.



The design strategy involves a process of degradation, in which obsolete objects—manmade constructions and landscape—gradually decay and turn into wilderness.

There are THREE STAGES of this degradation and three boundaries that form and vanish in time.






Phase 1
Surrounding Area

Establishing eco-corridors and buffer zones to connect surrounding mountains.

After analyzing regional building varieties, corresponding structures could be added to areas of different functions and to passage ways in between.

Then, roads and streets can play not only the role of connecting people, but also of bringing co-existing beings together. (now in Taiwan suburb area, 70% wild animal dead by roadkill)

During this period, categorized species. The established buffer zones around the park would limit urban activities and form an activity borderline.







Phase 2
Zoo Transition Period

     
The zoo is still in use. However, large structures in the park return to wilderness gradually, while maintaining the minimal functions of the zoo with SHORT-TERM, SIMPLE STRUCTURES.

Before the original zoo ceases to be operative, the old field and track would serve as temporary cages and vegetation displays. People continue to look at the animals but change their viewing perspectives.

The old stadium is stripped to merely keep the structure and shape, so that native species could spawn according to our conservation plans. Animals are no longer exhibited for show.

If we are all individuals occupying the land and the forest, we should be equal. We hide behind buildings and bushes to peek.

                                 




Phase 3
Ecology Restoration


After non-native species die out and temporary structures rot into dirt, cages and their boundaries would be dismantled. Trees would grow into forests. Revived newborns would grow and return to their original forests, making the space a place for people to meet the original species and a place for more lives to thrive.



Existing Construction
Return to Wilderness



Each existing construction is categorized to beat different stages of the “returning to wilderness” process in terms of:


the level of human occupation,
the growth of wild species, and
the completeness of its structure.






Charater of
the Narrator
Eventually, people can wander and watch in the new stadium structure where animals move freely, going up along the rising hills. The vegetation in the garden refl ects people’s unyielding illusion of nature, which can still be altered as minds change. The entire evolving process is educational. When people understand that the wilderness that surrounds us is the true existence, the outward form will dissolve and the true nature would reveal itself.

Traffic passing underground; researcher and restoration assistant continue staying at the site, and working underground. This new building serve as a narrator, filled with different program at different stage.

Finally, it metabolize with public value and time as well.








The architecture becomes a medium for us to understand animal habitats and it also becomes an animal shelter.




Eventually, species on this land have their own shelter and shared habitat without invasion.

Process of decay should also be counted in architecture design.



















Social Carbon


Hudson Valley, Suburban, and the Green New Deal




GSAPP Fall 2019
Urban Design Studio


Date  | 2019.10-12
Instructor  | Kaja Kühl (Coordinator), Anna Dietzsch, Jerome Haferd, Liz McEnaney, Justin Moore, Shachi Pandey, Raafi Rivero, David Smiley, Dragana Zoric
Team | You-Chiao Wu, Mary Allen, Minjung Lee, Candelaria Mas
Site | Hudson Valley+ Kingston, NY

As it stands, the Green New Deal is lacking the practical tools to implement the grand goals the document puts forth. There are plenty of innovativesolutions to the climate crisis, but the largest flaw in the system is understanding how these solutions hit the ground, and how toprevent the inequalities that the original New Deal inflected on manycommunities.




In order to visualize the complexities of the current system —where social needs and carbon emissions coexist—, we analyze the Hudson Valley on a transect that repeats along the region. We apply design thinking through a coordinated approach of varied projects that prioritize both people’s and environmental needs, as a tool to rethinking the Green New Deal as a middle ground —top down / grass-roots— initiative that motivates partnerships across disciplines and existing boundaries.







For this case study we decided to zoom in on Kingston NY. This unique balance of wetlands, urban areas, suburbs, farm land and forests has theamazing carbon balancing capacity, but only if it works together as a whole.

We hold a workshop in Kingston and while we were there we talked to many people as we could, and there seemed to be a common theme, such astransportation and housing issues.
We propose that there needs to be a new strategy of funding infrastructure projects that generate a hybrid top-downand bottom-up approach. It solves social needs by adding carbon value to it, and the common goal and strategy tackle both issues.



We start by proposing a Carbon Coordination Plan for Kingston NY that offers opportunities to reduce carbon emissions across the entire area.




This proposal is broad and comprehensive and offers strategies that should happen over time. And these projects happen at a variety of different scales,the Strategic scale, Community-scale, and Block scale interventions. Those projects are carbon zero affordable housing, net-zero neighborhoods,recharge hub, and wetland generator. They are run by different sectors
including municipalities, community-based organizations, and individuals.

We’re calling this system Social Carbon.



Neighborhood Regeneration






Carbon Zero Affordable Housing





Wetland Generator